On Wed, 1 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Sunder wrote:
>
> > So then, what's the answer? Capitalism or Crapunism under anarchy? :)
>
> Dunno .. but I sort of suspect that if we could pull off a true anarchy
> that it wouldn't matter much.
>
> Individuals could clump together and institute whatever sort of
> socio-economic system they like that suits their individual tastes and
> interests. A Hasidic Jew Communist community here, a Muslim Capitalism
> there .. as long as each group were allowed autonomy and self-government
> and as long as each individual in the group were afforded the same respect
> (by definition of anarchy) then, we have at an individual level the same
> thing we have at a national level now .. and capitalist nations
> trade freely with communist nations all the time.
That's Distributed Democracy, not anarchy.
Geesh.
____________________________________________________________________
The future is downloading. Can you hear the impact?
O[rphan] D[rift>]
Cyber Positive
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
