lcs Mixmaster Remailer wrote: > This is powerful writing, but one can't escape the thought that making > his advanced technology available on a non-exclusionary basis would be > a significant first step in bringing about this desirable outcome. I wrote to Brands about free implementations last year. His answer was, in essence, "forget it". Cheers, Ben. -- SECURE HOSTING AT THE BUNKER: http://www.thebunker.net/hosting.htm http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html Coming to ApacheCon? http://ApacheCon.Com/
- Re: Brands on privacy lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- RE: Brands on privacy Austin Hill
- RE: Brands on privacy Declan McCullagh
- RE: Brands on privacy Tim May
- RE: Brands on privacy - 2-Way-Ness Bill Stewart
- Re: Brands on privacy David Honig
- Re: Brands on privacy Marcel Popescu
- Brands on privacy lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- Re: Brands on privacy Ben Laurie
- Re: Brands on privacy Robert A. Hettinga
- Re: Brands on privacy Eugene Leitl
- Re: Brands on privacy mean-green
- Re: Brands on privacy David Honig
- Re: Brands on privacy R. A. Hettinga
- Re: Brands on privacy dmolnar
- Brands on privacy lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- Re: Brands on privacy David Honig
- RE: Brands on privacy Austin Hill
- RE: Brands on privacy John Young