Presumably they make some representation somewhere - in the manual? - about what they block or why? On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Ed Gerck wrote: > > > "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" wrote: > > > I think there may be a claim in defamation if your site was blocked and > > the software claims you have some kind of nasty content... > > But, what happens (as is the case) when that software claims nothing... > you cannot even view what is being blocked. A difamation claim IMO > would require others seeing a disclosure of the site's name in a blocking list > ... hmmm, that is perhaps why they do not disclose (even to parents?). > > Anyway, the idea of blocking and not even telling you what is being > blocked is a "trust me" procedure -- a well-known nothing. Trust me ;-) > > Cheers, > > Ed Gerck > > -- A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | [EMAIL PROTECTED] U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA +1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm -->It's warm here.<--
Re: CyberPatrol sues cryptanalysts who revealed flaws in itssoftware
Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law Fri, 17 Mar 2000 15:07:48 -0800
- Re: CyberPatrol sues cryptanalyst... Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
- Re: CyberPatrol sues cryptan... William Allen Simpson
- Re: CyberPatrol sues cry... William H. Geiger III
- Re: CyberPatrol sues cry... Ed Gerck
- Re: CyberPatrol sues... Tom Vogt
- Re: CyberPatrol sues... Tom Vogt
- The trump card, was ... Ed Gerck
- Re: The trump ca... William Allen Simpson
- Re: The tru... Declan McCullagh
- Re: CyberPatrol sues cryptan... keyser-soze
- Re: CyberPatrol sues cryptan... Tom Vogt