> > Maybe because Mike _published_ the fucking logs, just because JYA was > doing the mirror shades thing about whether the archive was or was not > genuine? I mean, JYA can be a very funny man. For sure. But does that > justify publishing Cryptome access logs?
I published them to verify the data, *AFTER JYA publicly accused me of FAKING it.* I only raised the point of the logs because of the GCHQ slide. *If *John had verified it a week earlier, or not accused me of faking data (with ZERO evidence, and the data turns out to be legit) *they never would've been published. *
