And so how should I have proved they were real, since John called it fake (either a lie of omission by refusing to check or a deliberate lie to conceal)??
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/09/2015 08:20 PM, Michael Best wrote: > >> > >> Publishing them was still unwarranted. You could have published a > >> redacted version. You could have polled this list, and verified selected > >> lines. Whatever. Yes, JYA was being a jerk. But still ... > > > > *Umm, I *did* post a redacted version first.* JYA said it was faked > > and refused to verify it until days after it had been published in its > > entirety. I even told him before hand that if he didn't verify it, I'd > > have to post it. He still called it disinfo and fake until well after > > it'd been released and confirmed as the files being un multiple > > releases, including an old torrent. > > Sorry. I had forgotten that. But once it's clear that multiple copies > are out there, I don't get the point of publishing your own copy. Maybe > by then, it's a moot point. It was still a bad move, if only for you. > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 10/09/2015 07:19 PM, Michael Best wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Maybe because Mike _published_ the fucking logs, just because JYA was > >>>> doing the mirror shades thing about whether the archive was or was not > >>>> genuine? I mean, JYA can be a very funny man. For sure. But does that > >>>> justify publishing Cryptome access logs? > >>> > >>> > >>> I published them to verify the data, *AFTER JYA publicly accused me of > >>> FAKING it.* I only raised the point of the logs because of the GCHQ > >> slide. *If > >>> *John had verified it a week earlier, or not accused me of faking data > >>> (with ZERO evidence, and the data turns out to be legit) *they never > >>> would've been published. * > >> > >> Publishing them was still unwarranted. You could have published a > >> redacted version. You could have polled this list, and verified selected > >> lines. Whatever. Yes, JYA was being a jerk. But still ... > >> > >> > > >
