John has yet to post a notice on his site alerting users to the log's leaking and the possible compromise, but he has added a warning about a "growing censor-tamper-implant-bowdlerize-redact-tag-track of archives, torrents, drops, shares, wikis, disclosure sites." So that's something?
> Mirrors of the Cryptome Archive should be accessed with caution, none have > been authenticated by Cryptome and sigs can be faked to hide tampering. > There is growing censor-tamper-implant-bowdlerize-redact-tag-track of > archives, torrents, drops, shares, wikis, disclosure sites. I guess John was right before. "Compromise should be publicized but seldom is: *hide, deny, ignore, delude*." On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Michael Best <[email protected]> wrote: > You can read through the emails for yourself, no doubt. Start with the > original email about the GCHQ slide with redacted IPs, where I ask for > verification/validation. > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Cari Machet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Show me the email where you called for help ... i have been traveling >> heavy so missed it >> >> The type of work of forensics research is important and how ot is >> conducted is as well >> >> Its not about my personal stamp of approval it is about community and >> respecting of and embodiment of the community >> >> If anyone including john is being a fucker we need to account for that >> On Oct 10, 2015 12:04 PM, "Michael Best" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The list had been involved since the first post about the GCHQ slide. >>> The list was no help at all. >>> >>> Sorry you don't approve, Cari, but what's done is done. The list was >>> consulted and no help. John Young refused to acknowledge the problem - *or >>> fix it. *[sarcasm] But what's terribly wrong is that I reported it - >>> *not* that John leaked it or lied it about it when he kept denying it >>> or anything else. [/sarcasm] >>> >>> >>>> *Cari Machet* [email protected] >>>> >>>> <carimachet%40gmail.com?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bcryptome%5D%20Re%3A%20%5Bcryptome%5D&In-Reply-To=%3CCAGRDzQX8MeKa3DuwLaNpW-jfTneECwos-oXhSxo0iCb5V%2BGsHA%40mail.gmail.com%3E> >>>> *Sat Oct 10 04:51:59 EDT 2015*Still michael best you could have >>>> consulted the list here That someone calls you a liar therefor you act is >>>> an ego based mindset Answer why you decided to not consult this list that >>>> has profoundly smart >>>> beings on it You could have asked this list for help we are interested >>>> in helping with >>>> such matters i would say and you could have done so without revealing >>>> info >>>> ... did this never cross your mind ? If it never even crossed your mind >>>> to consult us i find there is something >>>> terribly wrong >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:01 AM, coderman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/9/15, Michael Best <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > ... *they never would've been published. * >>>> >>>> i find it useful to think of voice. published yes, with little voice. >>>> >>>> now it's most certainly a loud something! >>>> the published always was, however... >>>> >>> >>> >
