On 10/11/2015 11:37 AM, bbrewer wrote: > Has anyone stopped to think that perhaps it was on absolute purpose as a > warning of lack of safety on his servers due to known 'but unable to speak > about’ system compromise? Ie. The same fashion as a warrant canary, or what > have you?
I thought about that. AAMOF I posted that thought about another website that had been behaving oddly recently. On 10/02/2015 09:53 AM, in the thread "Re: What is this "Weird garbled Windows 7 update"?", Razer wrote: > Suppose it's a way to mass-distribute a dead 'canary', offed by someone > in the company who knows something the company wasn't willing to kill > it's 'canary' over? > > Just rumormongering... > > RR >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
