On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 18:26 +0000, jim bell wrote: > > I don't see how there can be "scientific consensus" unless there are > accurate computer models which show how up climate temperature > increases as a product of addition of CO2 to the atmosphere. Both > qualitatively and quantitatively. How much do these problems > represent? >
I feel like you have your head in the sand. I mean, are you serious? There are all sorts of computer models that have shown this relationship. https://www.skepticalscience.com/climate-models.htm > > There is also the prospect of adding SO2 to the high atmosphere to > counteract heating, which could be a very cheap solution. > Yes, hopefully we can solve the problem we've created with better science. I have some hope that we can. But I wouldn't bet on it. -- John
