At 11:58 AM 10/16/00 -0700, Joshua R. Poulson wrote: > >Isn't utterly obvious that the NSA, just any decent person, >compartmentalizes its security so that if one system were >broken, the other systems would not necessarily be broken? Very well said. They also benefit from security via obscurity (to *some* extent) because they have nice men with fully automatic weapons to enforce said NDAs.
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? petro
- Re: why should it be trusted? David Honig
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? James A.. Donald
- Re: why should it be trusted? Sampo A Syreeni
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Joshua R. Poulson
- Re: why should it be trusted? David Honig
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Declan McCullagh
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? R. A. Hettinga
- Re: why should it be trusted? Kerry L. Bonin
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: why should it be trusted? Ray Dillinger
- Re: why should it be trusted? Kerry L. Bonin