On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:33 AM jim bell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, November 25, 2018, 7:05:09 PM PST, Zenaan Harkness 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Sadly, global warming is a complete hoax, to impose a global tax, to
> fund a global "one worl order" or "new world order".
>
> And there is a likely (at least partial) solution at hand:
>
> https://www.technologyreview.com/s/511016/a-cheap-and-easy-plan-to-stop-global-warming/
>        2013
>
> https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603974/harvard-scientists-moving-ahead-on-plans-for-atmospheric-geoengineering-experiments/
>      2017
>
> https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610007/were-about-to-kill-a-massive-accidental-experiment-in-halting-global-warming/
>     2018
>
> https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/201710/hand-hubris.cfm     2017
>
> https://www.technologyreview.com/video/609390/climate-disruption-technical-approaches-to-mitigation-and-adaptation/
>      2017
>
> (Full disclosure:  I have a Bachelor's degree in Chemistry from MIT, Class of 
> 1980).
>
> While I am not sufficently convinced that, quantitatively, "global warming" 
> ("climate change"), or more specifically AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warning) 
> is a genuine problem,  I'd say it would be irresponsible to not prepare for 
> the possibility that this sulfur-injection protocol will be necessary, or at 
> least useful.  It should be quite cheap. Further, there are likely to be 
> various (positive) feedback-loops associated with global warming, such as the 
> thawing of permafrost, whose magnitude aren't well-understood.
>
> I suspect that the main opposition to this idea comes from people who see 
> "climate change" as simply an opportunity to increase government control over 
> the world.  They think that they've found themselves one hell of a problem, 
> but a problem which would be threatened,  like garlic or a silver bullet, or 
> a gold cross, to a vampire.
>
>                    Jim Bell

So, the solution to warming is smog? Really? Perhaps if injected at a
high enough altitude it won't affect lungs, but it seems like SO2
isn't something we want to pump into the atmosphere...

Kurt

Reply via email to