List archives are down - the website is going to the gutenberg vhost. On July 26, 2019 5:47:48 AM UTC, grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote: >Rethread from >https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2019-July/075615.html > >Priv said: >>> Subject: You have been unsubscribed from the cryptography mailing >list >> that looks a lot like an auto-remove due to bounces > >No. That's the admin unsubscribe button talking. > >[email protected] is run by silly censors. > >> Perhaps this would be a good time to > >Call them out and quit that list for elsewhere. > > > >> You have been unsubscribed from the cryptography mailing list > >> 554 5.7.1 <[email protected]>: Recipient address rejected: >> you must be a subscriber to [email protected] to post to the >list. > >> The email address you supplied is banned from this mailing list. If >> you think this restriction is erroneous, please contact the list >> owners at [email protected]. > >To expand... there were *never* at any time any messages >posted through to the list that in any way justify >this laughable action by Perry the Censor, because >the list is under total moderation... as such, said >"moderaters" have personally approved every single >poster, thread, and message to the list. Therefore >every message posted to the list, including mine, >has been *by exclusive logical definition* fully >compliant with charter and fully endorsed by >"moderator" and, regarding what did post, had every >oppurtunity to be discussed, counter opined, even >objected to by the list recipients publicly on list, to >which there were effectively no substantive objections >therein, either due to lack of cause, and or due to >themselves being censored on objections, thus >any of those objections were logically deemed invalid >by moderator that action serving as a double approval >by moderator. > >There is no reason to believe subjects of censorship >will be permitted to open original thread discussion >on list regarding such censorship, nor be successful >in raising argument direct to censorious moderators... >history shows both those as generally futile efforts... >thus there can be no real expectation that the censored >should even bother trying such avenues of recourse. >To wit, who has succeeded with Facebook, YouTube, >Twitter, Instagram, etc... people have to quit them >and move to better solutions. > >Instead of following on from the rare mentions of >censorship that did made it on list by opening up a full >original thread discussion with and for subscribers >on list in public as to why Perry the Censor approved >tens of one sided threads and posts through to the >list, and then blocked counter opinion, reference >links, conversation and data from being posted in >reply to those very same threads and posts moderators >approved in the first place, or by direct notice... >Perry the Censor hit the ban button when proven and >logged out as Biased Censor to the other topically >related yet unmoderated and public cypherpunks list. > >Note the ban button clearly being laughably pointless, >and supports above status, as again, the list is under >total moderation whereby all posts must be approved, >and the ban button has zero effect on other fora. > >At least now more people know the list is unreasonably >biased and censored. > >""Cryptography" is ... devoted to cryptographic >technology and its political impact ... security and >privacy technology and its impact ... technical >aspects of cryptosystems, social repercussions of >cryptosystems, and the politics of cryptography ... >export ... laws ..." > >Surely Satoshi is a bit dissapointed at artificial curtailment >of discussion in above areas regarding their cryptosystem >Genesis. One would hope that no original leaks of >Top Secret breaks to cryptosystems are being censored >there, and that no other games are being played with >crypto topics... who knows. > >I might reconsider claimed status in re censorship, bias, >hypocrisy, etc upon such time as there is free and open >discussion on the [email protected] list such >that the list membership may become apprised >and participate as the ongoing source of moderation >guidance, and upon such time as any reasonably mindful >to charter original threads approved are able to >enjoy reasonably full illumination thereafter by all >subscribers interested in doing so respectably within >thread topic as developed. > > >Here's the censored post that caused the Censor's minds to explode... > >https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2019-July/075596.html > >For more fun... besides searching this list for more >"[email protected]" censorship logs, >and the FUD and Anti posts moderator approved to be thrown >at true cypherpunk cryptoanarchic cryptocurrencies and philosophy >over time there... see all the random posts that then got approved >even in just this OP thread, yet the sole one that plainly noted >prophecy regarding both Orange's Twittered USD and Red's FB Libra >Fiat GovBankCorp Regulator Coins... got censored, it's not there... > >https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2019-July/035180.html > >... you have no idea what got censored in that thread, >or in any other thread there over the years, because there's >zero transparency there... it's readers are seemingly >being steered by Censors tilting... seeded, fed, and programmed >with a thought stream that is not permitted to be countered. >Is this what we should have for a group of applied cryptographers, >GovCorp consultants, open source devs, that at least part of >the world might look to for, or receive in, their crypto things? > >And here's Serf and Order Follower Tamzen Cannoy doing >Perry Metzger the Censors wetwork for him as usual... >https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2019-July/035195.html > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roBgsXA77Zs >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_y9FpBAVuIc >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZON5IlxyBkQ >https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=order+followers >https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=tommy+robinson+banned+speech > > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpra3cFLmMo > >Don't be Silenced, Share the Risk, Speak Freely...
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
