To comment further, it looks like P-S may have been setting up a little disruption around the difference between the goals of your project and the benefits and failings of existing blockchains, and maybe some other social differences going on. I can't know why they would do that, but often it's satisfying to see the different people involved learn by getting confused around each other, because it means the confusion is on a path to resolving (even if that resolution involves further conflict). Blockchains are a high-emotions topic for some: hating or loving them for a variety of reasons. P-S's interaction with you resulted in you making this post, and us responding to you.
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 6:02 PM Karl <gmk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey, > > It's notable that your software is closed source, and I really understand > open source as what is expected to be supported on this list. > > But Punk-Stasi was "flaming" you and you don't need to listen to that. > People aren't censored here. That means random criticism comes through. > Do you need help setting up filters? > > K > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:06 AM other.arkitech < > other.arkit...@protonmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear readers, >> My intention is to respond to a public attack against my honesty and the >> legitimacy of my proposal. >> >> I am pretty annoyed for the behavior of this individual in the list >> towards the system I am presenting here. >> >> I don't know anything about him or her or whether they are a group of >> gansters operating the same moniker. >> The only thing I know is that they are pushing my project USPS is a SCAM >> and thus I am a SCAMMER, or the other way around. >> >> I call to everyone willing to read the landing page of my project, which >> I provide a pdf attached, >> and, from it and the ideas grasped in this list, manifest IF it could be >> deduced that this is a scam, or looks like. Please manifest. >> >> Otherwise, everyone undermining legitimate and respectable projects run >> by others, in any stage of development, on any stage in their roadmap, with >> counter positive and public undermining attitude. >> Those should be IMHO punished with public ashame until an apology is >> published by, in this case, PunkStasi. >> >> I leave it this way, >> Please, anyone, let me know reasons for which this email is WRONG or/and >> RIGHT. >> Thanks. >> -- >> Other Arkitech >> >> The project this subject airs as a scam: http://otheravu4v6pitvw.onion/ >> Ref: https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-May/080648.html >> >> >> >>