no worries, i understand how this sort of threads can produce unintended damage you're right, many things come from a forefront defensive barrier given past episodes.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 10:53 PM, John Young <[email protected]> wrote: > My comment was not aimed at you, a number of folks have posted > requests to enlist supporters, researchers, funders, for their > projects. A few have repeated the tequests for many months, became > irate and accusatory at lack of response. Might wonder if the aim > is/was to grab free work, or proselitize for an ideology, overcome > loneliness and isolation, front for others, or to just fuck with > somebody. All these have been happening on cpunks since its earliest > days. Lack of moderation allows that abuse or promise. Promises have > sometimes come true. Moderation never delivers on promises, usually > suppresses them as off-topic or calling them trolls.. > > At 06:35 PM 5/26/2020, you wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > It's notable that your software is closed source, and I really > > > understand open source as what is expected to be supported on this list. > > > But Punk-Stasi was "flaming" you and you don't need to listen to > > > that. People aren't censored here. That means random criticism > > > comes through. Do you need help setting up filters? > > > K > > > > Nah, one thing is criticism and other is a guy calling you > > repeatedly a scammer when you are showing up your work. That is not > > precisely good taste. > > the source code is GPL, but I haven't published it yet, that's all. > > Is in the roadmap. For reasons it will be released before 1.0 > > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:06 AM other.arkitech > > > <mailto:[email protected][email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear readers, > > > My intention is to respond to a public attack against my honesty > > > and the legitimacy of my proposal. > > > I am pretty annoyed for the behavior of this individual in the list > > > towards the system I am presenting here. > > > I don't know anything about him or her or whether they are a group > > > of gansters operating the same moniker. > > > The only thing I know is that they are pushing my project USPS is a > > > SCAM and thus I am a SCAMMER, or the other way around. > > > I call to everyone willing to read the landing page of my project, > > > which I provide a pdf attached, > > > and, from it and the ideas grasped in this list, manifest IF it > > > could be deduced that this is a scam, or looks like. Please manifest. > > > Otherwise, everyone undermining legitimate and respectable projects > > > run by others, in any stage of development, on any stage in their > > > roadmap, with counter positive and public undermining attitude. > > > Those should be IMHO punished with public ashame until an apology > > > is published by, in this case, PunkStasi. > > > > > > I leave it this way, > > > Please, anyone, let me know reasons for which this email is WRONG > > > or/and RIGHT. > > > Thanks. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Other Arkitech > > > The project this subject airs as a scam: > > > http://otheravu4v6pitvw.onion/http://otheravu4v6pitvw.onion/ > > > Ref: > > > https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-May/080648.htmlhttps://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-May/080648.html
