On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 04:07:27AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote: > On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:28:04 +1000 > [email protected] wrote: > > > On 2020-10-21 07:10, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote: > > > > > > I'll be waiting for any actual 'cypherpunk' or libertarian to shred > > > donalds 'philosophy' to pieces. I think I'm going to wait a looong time. > > > > The libertarian justification for controls on recreational drug use is > > that drug abuse, vice, causes harmful externalities for third parties. > > DUDE! You are NOT a libertarian and what you have just vomited is more > fascist nonsense. > > There is no libertarian 'justification' for violating personal rights.
This too sounds like it "should be obvious" :) > The idea that libertarians can 'justify' "controls on recreational drug > use" is the kind of deranged nonsense that can only come from you. That is, > if you're not just a retarded troll with nothing better to do. > > > > As a result there are no end of ingenious workarounds to provide > > selective restriction on the availability of alcohol in native American > > communities while maintaining lip service to equality before the law, > > correct, hypocritical fascism is the stock in trade of you, white-trash > jew-kkkristian ameri-cunts. Tell me something I don't know? > > > > We do not in fact have equality before the law, > > because you are human garbage. Next. > > > Now, I again invite any actual cypherpunk (james is obv. NOT in said > category) to refute james' 'political philosophy'.
