On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:37:07 PM PDT, jam...@echeque.com 
<jam...@echeque.com> wrote:
 
 On 2020-10-21 07:10, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
 
>     I'll be waiting for any actual 'cypherpunk' or libertarian to shred 
> donalds 'philosophy' to pieces. I think I'm going to wait a looong time. 
[snip]

>We do not in fact have equality before the law, because actual equality
before the law leads to intolerable consequences, because individuals,
groups, and communities are not in fact equal, and require different 
laws.-------------------------
Jim Bell's current Comment:The following is a recent draft that I had not yet 
completed and sent:
-------------------About February 6, 2015, Michael Bloomberg gave a 
kinda-sorta-public  speech in Colorado.   This   
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bbjB3jVGRU&t=1794s   may be it.   I believe 
that he asked that it not be recorded,  but the fact that the audio recording 
is here apparently resulted from someone sneakily doing just that.  The audio 
is a bit weak, but it's there. 
 
The news item from that time said that Bloomberg had proposed that young racial 
minorities shouldn't be allowed to own guns, maybe younger than 30 years old.   
Google ' "bloomberg" young blacks guns '     He believed in that idea enough to 
state it out loud.  

https://www.nraila.org/articles/20150213/bloombergs-comments-add-to-a-long-tradition-of-racially-charged-gun-control-rhetoric


 I was not surprised that Bloomberg BELIEVED this, but I was very surprised 
that he said it, more or less openly, out loud and in front of strangers.  
Clearly, this put others, gun-control advocates, into a major quandary.  If 
those 'liberals', or 'progressives' actually BELIEVED that anti-gun nonsense, 
they ought to be in favor of measures that might actually save lives.  But they 
don't, or at least their level of belief doesn't rise to the level of 
overcoming their loathing of 'discrimination', the idea that people are treated 
differently as a consequence of race.  But are human lives less important than 
Political Correctness?

This is somewhat of a self-inflicted version of the meme, "Islam is right about 
women".    
https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/09/26/the-genius-of-the-islam-is-right-about-women-stunt/
   

"First, they acknowledge – usually with irreducible simplicity – that something 
that went without saying a moment ago has suddenly become unsayable. Secondly, 
the outrage they provoke does not come from any epithet, caricature or insult, 
but rather from having the nerve to draw the viewer’s attention to an act of 
cognitive dissonance that we are all engaging in, but would rather not 
acknowledge."
"The result is that those who attempt to explain why the act is offensive end 
up simply tying themselves in knots, while revealing that they have never given 
a moment’s thought to the position they find themselves defending. This seems 
to generate even more anger, with the inevitable online mob quickly joined by 
politicians, journalists and other public figures, eager to see that the 
heretic is made an example of."
[end of quote]

On Friday, October 16, 2020, 08:26:48 PM PDT, Zenaan Harkness 
<z...@freedbms.net> wrote:


On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 11:14:06PM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:30:24 +1100
> Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> wrote:
> 
> > Given how vehemently, persistently (even "religiously") that "the left" 
> > targets the removal of guns, the removal of the second amendment, it looks 
> > to some like guns ARE a thawn in the side of the empire.

  

Reply via email to