Steve Furlong wrote: > Why not just read the first 20 bytes of the body? If 90% or more aren't > printable ASCII assume the message is encrypted. Or compressed, or a bitmap, or executable code, or coming from an EBCDIC machine, or using a weird variant of Unicode that you weren't previously aware of, or audio, or video... Without a header at the front saying "This is PGP version such-and-such" (or whatever other algorithm is used) there is no way to tell well-encrypted text from some sorts of compressed files. That is part of the point - if the encrypted text was obviously different from random data the difference could contain clues. Ken
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Trei, Peter
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Jim Choate
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Steve Furlong
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Jim Choate
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Sean Roach
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Bill Stewart
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Ken Brown
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Tom Vogt
- Re: CDR: RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Tom Vogt
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Tom Vogt
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk R. A. Hettinga
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Trei, Peter
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Trei, Peter
- Re: Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Bill Stewart
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Trei, Peter
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Trei, Peter
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Bill Stewart
