> ----------
>
> Ralf-Philipp Weinmann[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Sampo A Syreeni wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, David Honig wrote:
> > One variation of the original proposal would be to only allow egress to
> > addresses known to lay in a jurisdiction different from the one in which
> the
> > remailer resides. I know, the problem is nontrivial with all the dotcom
> > addresses and such around. Does doing a DNS lookup and working on IP
> > addresses help?
[...]
> What one could do however is have the remailer pass on every message which
> has a recipient address that is *known to be in a jurisdiction that is
> different
> from the remailers*. You will not be able to reach each and every target
> then, but at least it's better than nothing.
> On the other hand I remember that the Curch of Scientology was able to
> have an impact on anon.penet.fi despite the fact that this remailer was
> outside
> of US jurisdiction. Maybe we have to come up with a list of "incompatible"
> jurisdiction systems to avoid this sort of thing from happening again.
>
> Cheers,
> -Ralf
>
So when is the HavenCo remailer going up?
Peter Trei
