"Trei, Peter" wrote: > I would like to suggest that a remailer could eliminate nearly all it's > problems by only sending out encrypted mails - that is, if after > removing the encryption that was applied using it's own private > key, it finds that the result is plaintext, it simply drops the message. I like that idea. so much that I might start a remailer with these properties, in order to test it out. single question left: what is a reliable way to see whether or not a text is plain or cipher?
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Trei, Peter
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Jim Choate
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Steve Furlong
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Jim Choate
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Sean Roach
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Bill Stewart
- Re: CDR: Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Ken Brown
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Tom Vogt
- Re: CDR: RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Tom Vogt
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Tom Vogt
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk R. A. Hettinga
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Trei, Peter
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Trei, Peter
- Re: Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Bill Stewart
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Trei, Peter
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Trei, Peter
- RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Bill Stewart
- RE: Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Trei, Peter
- Re: Anonymous Remailers cpunk Jim Choate
