Robert Bradshaw wrote: > Greg hasn't spoken up on this thread yet (I'd be really curious to > see what he says) but I would hazard a guess that Pyrex will lean to > C types being raw C types, C semantics and all.
I haven't thought it through in detail yet, but yes, probably. There's already a // operator I can use to get Python-like int division. I may add a %% operator to do the same for mod. To get efficient operations when you don't care about negative numbers, you can use unsigned types with %% and //. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
