Robert Bradshaw wrote: > That's because x[0] was always the same thing as (*x), even if a bit > uglier. I'm not not as enthusiastic about it now (though not yet for > sure set against it either...)
The reason for not having a * operator in Pyrex was to avoid possible ambiguities when parsing arguments to function calls (since Python already assigns a meaning to prefix * in that context). If you want to introduce a * operator you'll have to deal with that somehow. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
