Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>  - Numerical computations in Cython (a copy of the corresponding paper)

> 4) I think the current Cython/NumPy tutorial should be removed in favour 
> of the above generic tutorial + numerical Cython paper; opinions on that?

Well, one good intro to numpy+cython is better than two that both need 
to be maintained.

However, maybe it's my personal use-case bias, but I think that numpy is 
almost a standard part of Cython use -- I can't think of what I'd like 
to optimize that I wouldn't want to use numpy for! And numpy is why I 
skipped past pyrex and straight to Cython.

I suppose one could be doing a lot of string operations or something, 
but for the most part, if you need compiled speed, you're working with a 
lot of numbers, and numpy arrays are THE way to deal with a lot of 
numbers (Or maybe the new buffer object, once it is widely supported by 
PIL, etc)

What I'm proposing is that numpy info be integrated into the docs from 
the beginning.

-Chris





-- 
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer

Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R            (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to