Robert Bradshaw wrote: > Does anyone have any objections to merging -unstable into -devel in > preparation for the next release?
I bet you meant that anyway, but I'd prefer replacing cython-devel with cython-unstable, and (maybe) keeping the current cython-devel as a legacy 0.11.x branch. We kept cython-unstable updated from cython-devel, so there shouldn't be anything missing. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
