Sorry, I'm lost ... Can any of you explicitly explain what the new repo names are going to be? BTW, if we are going to leave a legacy 0.11.3 branch, it would be clear to rename it to cython-release-0.11 or something like that...
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 5, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > >> Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> Does anyone have any objections to merging -unstable into -devel in >>> preparation for the next release? >> >> I bet you meant that anyway, but I'd prefer replacing cython-devel >> with >> cython-unstable, and (maybe) keeping the current cython-devel as a >> legacy >> 0.11.x branch. >> >> We kept cython-unstable updated from cython-devel, so there >> shouldn't be >> anything missing. > > Yes, that's what I meant, -unstable would become the new -devel up on > hg.cython.org > > - Robert > > > _______________________________________________ > Cython-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev > -- Lisandro Dalcín --------------- Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594 _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
