Stefan Behnel wrote: > Lisandro Dalcin wrote: >> Sorry, I'm lost ... Can any of you explicitly explain what the new >> repo names are going to be? BTW, if we are going to leave a legacy >> 0.11.3 branch, it would be clear to rename it to cython-release-0.11 >> or something like that... > > Ah, now that you mention it: Cython 0.11.3 didn't make it to the "cython" > branch. > > We should make Cython 0.11.3 "cython" now and "cython-0.11" when Cython > 0.12 gets released, and Cython 0.12 "cython-devel" now and "cython" when it > gets released (with continued development in "cython-devel"). > > Let's see when we start needing a new "cython-unstable" then.
IMO cython-closures should be our new cython-unstable, to make sure it is tested and merged and keep the number of (cooperative) branches down. And I think that if there's possibilities of a bug day, it would be good to take it before 0.12 to knock off all those small irritating "Cython crashes" bugs. But I guess that shouldn't hold off 0.12 for too long, we can do a 0.12.1 a month later anyway. -- Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
