johnf wrote: > Sorry Nate I disagree with respect of extending AppWizard. I would like to > see the AppWizard dropped. Let me say I use AppWizard everytime I want to > test the data interfaces but that's all.
I believe Nate was suggesting documenting AppWizard, for the purpose of telling of its strengths and weaknesses. To summarize the various viewpoints as I see them (people can correct me if I have it wrong): Paul: Keep AppWizard as-is, get it documented Ed: Eventually extend AppWizard to cdxml; get it documented Nate: Get it documented John: Drop AppWizard Carl: Make it into something better, faster, stronger. Extend! I don't understand wanting to drop something that *at least* lets you test data interfaces, and *at most* gives you a skeleton for a highly-scalable application. I do understand the benefits of getting it documented, so it can be seen in its proper context vis-a-vis Dabo itself. -- pkm ~ http://paulmcnett.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
