Paul McNett wrote: > Uwe Grauer wrote: >> There might be a bug, yes. >> >> But it isn't valid python code either. >> Try to run it in python. >> So why shouldn't we reflect this as a different extension? > > If it isn't valid Python, it should have a different extension. What > about it isn't valid Python? Do you mean it doesn't compile or something > else? > > If I understand correctly, it is (supposed to be) valid Python. >
How should i say it? It only makes sense as something which gets mixed into the xml-layout. It should be valid syntax (if there are no bugs) but is useless as it is. You wouldn't expect it to do something useful without it getting mixed into the layout. You wouldn't put some code snippets info a normal .py file if these code snippets wouldn't do anything useful when the .py file gets run by python. What would you expect if you run python MyClassdesignerRenerated-code.py? Nothing useful? I don't know how to express it (other than that). _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
