On Feb 18, 2011, at 11:30 AM, John Fabiani wrote:
> 2.4 is getting a little old at this point don't you think ( final release Nov
> 30, 2004 with a security update in 2006). That said upgrading to 2.6 has
> several security advantages along with the improved code. But most important
> is the fact using 2.6 syntax is a stepping stone to 3.x. At some point in
> the
> near future wxPython for 3.x will be available and users will start using it.
>
> And of course we might have to fix some of the 2.4 code to comply.
I'm not making the point that it's good to *code* in 2.4; my point if
there is a sufficient advantage to the framework in telling those who must use
older version X that they can no longer use Dabo.
IMO, if there is a significant gain to the framework to justify
excluding those who for whatever reason use older version X, then we do it.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
