On 02/18/2011 06:46 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Feb 18, 2011, at 11:30 AM, John Fabiani wrote: > >> 2.4 is getting a little old at this point don't you think ( final release >> Nov >> 30, 2004 with a security update in 2006). That said upgrading to 2.6 has >> several security advantages along with the improved code. But most >> important >> is the fact using 2.6 syntax is a stepping stone to 3.x. At some point in >> the >> near future wxPython for 3.x will be available and users will start using >> it. >> And of course we might have to fix some of the 2.4 code to comply. > > > I'm not making the point that it's good to *code* in 2.4; my point if > there is a sufficient advantage to the framework in telling those who must > use older version X that they can no longer use Dabo. > > IMO, if there is a significant gain to the framework to justify > excluding those who for whatever reason use older version X, then we do it. > > > > -- Ed Leafe
+1 for keeping python 2.4 support without reasons against it. I think that python 2.4 support should be extended <= python 3.x. Maybe Dabo should break with old (< python 3.x) code when the first Dabo version tries to support python 3.x. This should be a new svn branch! Uwe _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
