On 11/8/11 12:33 PM, Jacek Kałucki wrote: > Użytkownik Paul McNett napisał: >> And for the biz layer in r6963. > > Thanks Paul.
You are welcome. Thank you for pointing out the problems with my approach. I'm stoked that using ChildCacheInterval seems to be working now because that does provide the best performance while maintaining expected integrity. > Despite that, I decided to stay with the old dForm code, > since new one doesn't bring any benefits in my applications, > but requites from me to redesign them, what for I don't have spare time now. Once you get a chance, if you could gently point out to me why you must redesign your forms, I'd appreciate it. Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
