On Tuesday 07 October 2008 06:04:49 pm Ed Leafe wrote: > My point is that he shouldn't have to specify the NonUpdateFields if > the field name is not contained in the base table; Dabo is supposed to > check this and automatically exclude fields that are not in the source > table
I'm aware of the bug you are suggesting exist. But also I'm waiting for you comfirm it is a bug - it use to work for me. In the mean time I'm telling him how he might get around the problem. This does not prevent you from confirming the bug and fixing it. To be honest I'm not sure the framework should attempt to add A.I. to bizobjs. Can't a developer realize that he/she needs to use NonUpdateFields when using joins. It just makes sense that's how it would work. -- John Fabiani _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
