Ed Leafe wrote: > On Feb 7, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Uwe Grauer wrote: > >> Ok, but i don't think that this makes any sense. >> I explicitly told Dabo to use fwadm.cnxml. >> I could understand a automatic searching for a connection name if >> there wasn't specified the connection file explicitly but i think it >> is >> a bug if Dabo overwrites a connection specification just because there >> is a second file which includes the same connection name. > > > Connection files are conveniences. They can have 1-M connections > defined. Once a definition is loaded, the file it came from is no > longer relevant; the only thing that matters is the 'name'. >
I know that, but don't think that implicit conveniences should be allowed to overwrite my specification. >> Implicit automatic management is ok as long as it doesn't produce >> faulty >> behavior. > > In this case it is misunderstanding that 'name' is the key, not 'file > +name'. That's a dogmatic interpretation of the current implicit and wrong behavior. Anyway, what's the right way to tell Dabo to use a connection file without letting Dabo overwire my explicit settings? Uwe _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
