I am a big fan of PGP, however considering the current use of SMIME in existing mail implementations I don¹t understand the rationale for the deferral.
Since some of the more popular MUAs are able to digest SMIME already doesn¹t it make sense to include SMIMEA in the DANE toolbox to leverage that operational footprint? -- Glen Wiley Principal Engineer Verisign, Inc. (571) 230-7917 http://vbsdcon.com A5E5 E373 3C75 5B3E 2E24 6A0F DC65 2354 9946 C63A On 6/29/15, 2:41 PM, "Olafur Gudmundsson" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Dear Colleagues >The editors of draft-ietf-dane-smime have requested that draft be put on >hold for at least a year to see how the OPENPGP ³experiment² works out. >The chairs have agreed with this request. > >Olafur & Warren > > >_______________________________________________ >dane mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
