On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Danny McPherson wrote:
Furthermore, I see no defensible reason why an "OPENPGP "experiment"" would be blocking on this work - quite the contrary, actually. Had there been an actual discussion on this already-a-year-overdue-WG-milestone I suspect a responsible action would have been to find some new editors.
I actually also do not really understand the decision, other than the authors seeing a hot potato. I still believe it would be in the interest of both the OPENPGPKEY and the SMIMEA drafts that they continue to discuss and attempt to use the same lookup mechanism. iI suspect many software implementors that will implement one, will also implement the other. Since it is mostly a different format for the same idea, attempt to encrypt emails when a public key is advertised. Paul _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
