> design a solution, 3) deploy the solution. The IETF is (only) step #2.
Yeah, let's not have the designers talking with the deployers. That can
lead to interoperability and harmony, which IETF is dead set against.
I suggest that any dane member who doesn't want to continue, should
quit the group and resign from the mailing list. Then from your point
of view, the group will already be "shut down". Yet those who wish to
continue will still be able to continue.
>From whence is the pressure coming to "shut down the group entirely"?
Perhaps NSA is concerned that DANE might actually provide a usable
public key infrastructure for mass authentication and encryption?
Better shut that puppy right down, then, before it's too late.
John (irony trigger warning)
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
