As for the use of keeping the ML open after the WG has died: remind me again how successful that has been in the IETF.
It varies. Of the ones I can think of, the ietf-smtp list is useful as a place to kick around proposed SMTP changes, such as a current discussion about whether a compressed data extension would be a good idea and if so how to do it. There are certainly plenty that either have no traffic, or the messages aren't interesting.
It doesn't make any difference to me whether the dane list stays open, but if there is more left to say about publishing stuff in the DNS secured by DNSSEC, it'd be as good a place as any.
Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
