Hi Paul, A very quick reply, as I am travelling. I will do a longer version later:
> On 19 Apr 2016, at 21:05, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > > I will need guidance from the IESG on how to proceed. If we do not add > lowercasing as a step before hashing, > please let me know what text should be added where, so that I do not run into > new objections within the working group. I will suggest some text. I think we shouldn't add text about unconditional lower casing, but instead we should acknowledge that some systems are case sensitive (I think MTA from my employer can be like that when gatewaying to other email systems) and some are not. > >>> What needs to happen here is that the specification be revised to make >> it clear >>> that this is what is going on: That by publishing such records a domain >> is >>> granting a limited right to interpret the local parts of its >> addresses. >> >> I agree with this. A sentence or two on this would suffice. > > Can the IESG please provide the text and location for this, as some in the > working group are loudly opposed to any such text. Considering that this proposal came from an email expert, I don't think it would be controversial. (Earlier objection were from email experts.) But maybe I am optimistic. I will suggest some text. _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
