Hi Paul, On Wed, Apr 20, 2016, at 12:04 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Hi Paul,
[snip] > >>> What needs to happen here is that the specification be revised to make > >> it clear > >>> that this is what is going on: That by publishing such records a domain > >> is > >>> granting a limited right to interpret the local parts of its > >> addresses. > >> > >> I agree with this. A sentence or two on this would suffice. > > > > Can the IESG please provide the text and location for this, as some in the > > working group are loudly opposed to any such text. > > Considering that this proposal came from an email expert, I don't think > it would be controversial. (Earlier objection were from email experts.) > But maybe I am optimistic. > > I will suggest some text. After thinking more about this: as the document [correctly] prohibits any modifications of local-parts, the OPENPGP RRs don't really provide any information on whether a particular domain supports case-sensitive or case-insensitive local-parts (or any other variants a la Gmail). So I think leaving existing text "as is" is fine. I will separately suggest text to address other comments. _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
