On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:02 AM Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Paul, > A very quick reply, as I am travelling. I will do a longer version later: > > > On 19 Apr 2016, at 21:05, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I will need guidance from the IESG on how to proceed. If we do not add > lowercasing as a step before hashing, > > please let me know what text should be added where, so that I do not run > into new objections within the working group. > > I will suggest some text. > Thank you! > > I think we shouldn't add text about unconditional lower casing, but > instead we should acknowledge that some systems are case sensitive (I think > MTA from my employer can be like that when gatewaying to other email > systems) and some are not. > > > >>> What needs to happen here is that the specification be revised to make > >> it clear > >>> that this is what is going on: That by publishing such records a domain > >> is > >>> granting a limited right to interpret the local parts of its > >> addresses. > >> > >> I agree with this. A sentence or two on this would suffice. > > > > Can the IESG please provide the text and location for this, as some in > the working group are loudly opposed to any such text. > > Considering that this proposal came from an email expert, I don't think it > would be controversial. (Earlier objection were from email experts.) But > maybe I am optimistic. > I suspect you are being optimistic, but hopefully correctly so :-P W > > I will suggest some text. > > >
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
