You make a good case, but personally I still don't like domains because they tamper with one of the beautiful things about darcs: its minimal number of grouping/naming concepts. Unlike the alternatives, darcs has no separate concept for branches aside from the concept of repos, and in order to name repos it uses standard pre-existing naming schemes (scp, http, e-mail) instead of introducing its own concept of naming, and in order to group repos it uses standard pre-existing tools (filesystem, web server, e-mail bots). Therefore darcs comes very close to introducing *no* new grouping/naming concepts, where other systems introduce at least two and usually more.
I treasure this simplicity and am reluctant to let it go. Regards, Zooko _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
