["Jason M. Felice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:53:59 -0500]:
> My impression (and I don't
> presume to have any weight around here, granted) is that this is way too
> specific a thing to get into the darcs code.
+1
Furthermore, if you don't want to have patches spanning different
"domains", then every domain should be its own repo IMO. If you want
to "use" something from a different domain, set up a Makefile / hook /
whatever-is-appropriate-for-your-workflow that makes some symlinks,
hardlinks, copies etc..
Albert.
P.S.: But I like the concept of a domain as a label for a set of files
(or even lines?). E.g., it might be attractive to say `darcs
replace --domain foo old new`, with commutation behavior that is
more flexible than the current one where we can only restrict
the replacement to explicitly listed files.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
