Jamie Webb wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:32:05AM -0800, John Meacham wrote:
darcs is just about perfect except for one thing, not having a straightforward
way to compose repositories. I know this issue has been discussed quite a bit
but I think I have a very lightweight proposal to mitigate this problem.
While I agree that some sort of support for multiple projects would be
very useful, this implementation has already been proposed, discussed,
and another one chosen. No-one ever wrote the code though:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.darcs.user/3304
John,
I'm not understanding your proposal yet, and I won't have much time to
try. But could you explain whether your proposal conflicts with the one
Jamie is referring to? And if it doesn't conflict, how much more
difficult would it make the user's understanding of darcs if both were
implemented?
The reason I ask, is because simplicity is a major goal for darcs, and
David's proposal in the thread Jamie mentions seems like a good one to
me. Ultimately someone might get around to it.
(I know you know, but for any others who spent time searching: the post
where David makes his proposal is
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.darcs.user/3464
It's the part about adding new patch types "addsubrepo" etc., near the end.)
Groetjes,
<><
Marnix
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
