On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:53:41AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > For plugin patches I think they would have to > > be defined in some declarative patch language from which darcs > > could deduce how to commute them. > > It doesn't have to be fully declarative does it? Haskell would do.
Hm, I probably was not thinking "plugin" enough but instead more like a scripting extension, something that can only express valid patch types. But maybe I wasn't thinking at all. -- Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
