>>>>> "Ketil" == Ketil Malde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Too late. You're already stuck using the unique editor that
>> understands darcs tokreplace patches: darcs. Now you're
>> talking about adding more of those,
Ketil> No, I am not. I am talking about adding a more granular
Ketil> method for determining patches.
If it's not compatible with diff/patch, it's a new kind of patch (==
editing operation) which only darcs understands.
>> locking users into darcs.
Ketil> I'm not sure I quite follow you. In fact, I am positive I
Ketil> don't have a clue what you are talking about. If I use a
Ketil> darcs repository, I am already locked into darcs?
For talking to the repository-as-database, yes. However, the
diff/patch operations are basically _editor_ operations, not repo
operations.
Ketil> Requiring collaborators to all use the same editor is a
Ketil> *much* more draconian step,
Exactly my point. :-)
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
