"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ketil> I'm (of course) not saying you should always do word-based > Ketil> diffs, only for formats where line-based diffs work poorly.
> How is darcs going to know? I suppose you could teach it, but what's > the interface going to be? Umm...well, either it could select based on file type, or it could be a project-wide setting, or both. Theoretically, it could be an option, but I think in general, you would choose a mode based on the file contents. > Too late. You're already stuck using the unique editor that > understands darcs tokreplace patches: darcs. > Now you're talking about adding more of those, No, I am not. I am talking about adding a more granular method for determining patches. > locking users into darcs. I'm not sure I quite follow you. In fact, I am positive I don't have a clue what you are talking about. If I use a darcs repository, I am already locked into darcs? Requiring collaborators to all use the same editor is a *much* more draconian step, and I simply don't see any reasonable rationale for doing so. -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
