Daniel Bünzli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[inverted quoting repaired by me]
> Le 23 févr. 06 à 14:29, rmuschall a écrit :
>> Something like this would be wrong if we are inside
>> \begin{verbatim}...\end{verbatim} or similar.
> I think you misunderstood me (if it is not the case
> then I'm not able to make any sense of your message).
> I was not talking about paragraphs in the result of the
> compilation. I was talking about paragraphs at the source
> code level.
That's exactly what I mean. In an ordinary piece of
LaTeX source,
foo foo foo foo foo foo
bar bar bar bar bar bar
is the same as
foo foo foo foo foo foo bar bar bar bar bar bar
But OTOH,
\begin{verbatim}
foo foo foo foo foo foo
bar bar bar bar bar bar
\end{verbatim}
is significantly different from
\begin{verbatim}
foo foo foo foo foo foo bar bar bar bar bar bar
\end{verbatim}
I.e. pieces of LaTeX source inside such a region must
be handled just like another programming language,
whereas those outside can be treated more (by splitting
at paragraphs (double linefeeds), then words (whitespace).
Unfortunately, \begin{verbatim} is not the only such
command, and recognizing them is nontrivial due to TeX's
ability to massively redefine its own input syntax on the
fly.
Ralf
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
