Le Jeudi 02 Mars 2006 02:01, Tommy Pettersson a écrit:
> But I wouldn't mind the more common <major>.<minor>.<bugfix>.
PostgreSQL use <major>.<minor>.<bugfix|improvements>
If major or/and minor change, this mean internal schema has changed and you
need to dump/restore your DB to upgrade.
For darcs, we can imagine a change of major implies a break of compatibility
in repository format.
I think this sounds very appealing.
But there is also an argument to be made for the kernel scheme to allocate certain version numbers as development versions. In GHC they accomplish this using the ordinary <major>.<minor>.<bugfix> with a twist. Every odd <minor> is a development version and the even ones are release versions. I think this works pretty well and might be an alternative scheme to consider.
All the best,
/Josef
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
