[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I mostly imagine this being a feature of use to other people (including to my clients and co-workers) rather than for myself, I think I'll fall silent on this issue and let other people have their say.
I agree with Zooko. I've come to expect that bumps in the last version number of something listed as the "stable" tree are bugfix or security related type releases.
Otherwise I don't think you can call the tree "stable." My own projects at the day job use the old kernel minor even,odd numbering scheme for stable and dev tree.
I don't so much care about that but I do think that the stable tree should only get bug fixes.
-- Richard A. Smith Bitworks, Inc _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
