Eric Kow: Sounds good!
It kind of seems like since the darcs-2.0.0 release we have been in "stable development" mode. That's fine (and we have definitely done a lot of good porting and bugfixing and testing which ought to go into a darcs-2.0.1 release soon), but I agree that we also need some more ambitious goals. I totally agree with your list -- performance issues and Windows polish. One particular thing that I'm interested in is scaling darcs up to bigger projects. We have the perfect customer right now -- the GHC team. They have strong demands, cooperate well with us in submitting bug reports, and they have the skills to help us fix bugs, too, if they choose. We should ask them for *their* wishlist for darcs-2.1.0. :-) (One reason that I'm interested in scaling up to bigger projects is that it is sometimes easier to spot performance problems on a big dataset, and then fixing that problem also improves behavior for people who have smaller datasets.) Regards, Zooko _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
