On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:51:03AM -0700, David Roundy wrote: > This is a known bug that has been announced in most of the darcs-2 > release announcements.
Ah, I see this is talked about on http://wiki.darcs.net/index.html/DarcsTwo I must have read it some time ago and forgotten about it. Anyway, from where I'm sitting, this just shows that primitive patches must be named, which is good news IMO, as I think it'll simplify the theory. We will now really have sets rather than bags, and I don't remember off-hand exactly what your arguments for using catches in contexts were, but I think that this means that we can just use patches rather than catches, as we don't need to worry about telling the contexted patches apart. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
