On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:51:03AM -0700, David Roundy wrote: >> This is a known bug that has been announced in most of the darcs-2 >> release announcements. > > Ah, I see this is talked about on http://wiki.darcs.net/index.html/DarcsTwo > > I must have read it some time ago and forgotten about it. > > Anyway, from where I'm sitting, this just shows that primitive patches > must be named, which is good news IMO, as I think it'll simplify the > theory. We will now really have sets rather than bags, and I don't > remember off-hand exactly what your arguments for using catches in > contexts were, but I think that this means that we can just use patches > rather than catches, as we don't need to worry about telling the > contexted patches apart.
No, it doesn't show any of that. It just shows that we need to fix darcs, because it's buggy. David _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
